Talk:Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike

Carrier operation has lead program officials to determine that either a stealthy, tailless design or a winged body with a tail could satisfy the Navy’s needs.
This sentence doesn't parse, and the various ways I can sort of parse it don't seem to add value to the paragraph, so I just removed it. Documenting it here in case somebody sees value and wants to rewrite it.Sbs9 (talk) 14:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Can we rename this to CBARS
Carrier-Based Aerial Refueling System? The name has changed

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/naval-aviation/2016/01/31/uclass-ucasd-navy-carrier-unmanned-jet-x47-northrop-boeing/79624226/

http://breakingdefense.com/2016/02/good-bye-uclass-hello-unmanned-tanker-more-f-35cs-in-2017-budget/

https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/cv-ucavs-the-return-of-ucas-03557/

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2016/february-2016-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/3542-us-navy-turns-uclass-combat-uav-program-into-cbars-aerial-refueling-uav.html

Phd8511 (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)