Talk:Until the Quiet Comes/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aircorn (talk · contribs) 01:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Will review this over the next few days AIR corn (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC) So far the prose is excellent. I have one suggestion from the first section, but otherwise I like what I am reading. I may make slight, uncontroversial changes as I go. Feel free to revert if you disagree with any of them. AIR corn (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Flying Lotus subsequently began planning new music. This seems unfinished and I am not sure exactly what point it is trying to get across. As a music producer it seems self explanatory (I would think the reverse would be more notable) and I am not sure why it is relevant to the article on this album
 * Removed. Dan56 (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thundercats role in this album is not made obvious in this section, despite getting a reasonable introduction. I am wondering if the previous sentence is supposed to end "...with Thundercat"?
 * His role on the album is discussed in the "recording" section. Dan56 (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Still think it would have been better linking him back to the album in the background paragraph, but it is not really an issue.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Nicely written article
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Maybe a little a little heavy on the quotes, but they didn't interrupt the flow or feel forced.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Well referenced. Spot checks check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Fine in this area
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Has the good with a few mixed in the review section.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I am not sure about File:Sasha3.jpg. It says we have permission to use it, but doesn't link to any permission. It seems to be of another DJ anyway so is probably not that vital to the article (plus it doesn't actually give any evidence that it is an Ableton Live sequencer). The rest seem fine.
 * I replaced the image with one of a drum kit setup, and a couple of digital tools, including a labtop running the sequencer program (screenshots of Ableton Live check out with the one in the image, albeit a bit to the far end of the image). Dan56 (talk) 10:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * All good. AIR corn (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * All good. AIR corn (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: