Talk:Unverified longevity claims

Requested move 28 February 2015
Incomplete longevity claims → Unverified longevity claims – These are historical claims that remain unverified. "Incomplete" is the term used by the website that tracks this, but "Unverified" is better in the encyclopedia. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. DrKiernan (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The first relisting was one day after initial request. --George Ho (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. I don't know what "incomplete" means. Tiles should be obvious. Is their longevity incomplete, meaning they are now dead. Or does it mean the verification is incomplete.


 * Oppose. Unverified makes no sense here as anything that is not verified shouldn't be included at all. Unverified I'm assuming means not verified by the GRG which is replacing our own policies with the GRG's standards. You can at least call these claims of longevity where the claim itself is not complete. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * They have reliable sources in the media claiming their age, they do not have reliable primary documents to confirm their exact birth date. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)