Talk:Up! (album)

Renegged Certification
In 2006, the RIAA renegged the DIAMOND certification for the album citing that it is, infact NOT a double album, only the same album remixed and included as a bonus disc to itself; a strange circumstance. Despite meeting qualification for a double album by length of the total package, the fact the the second disc is the same album, only remixed is irrelevant. The final decision was noted that if the albums were available seperately their sales would be combined, not doubled, despite the different style of each disc.

Sales
Anyone know the worldwide sales yes and maybe still are if that makes sense!

Fair use rationale for Image:UPRed2.jpg
Image:UPRed2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Versions
In the introduction should there be further clarification that the three versions all sound different? Meaning that a given track on the pop, country, or international version will have different production and a different "sound"? I think this is noteworthy and should be included in the article. Especially how it relates to Twain's marketing.Gth0824 21:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:UPRed2.jpg
Image:UPRed2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shania Twain - Up!.jpg
Image:Shania Twain - Up!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Sales?
If the album has been certified 11x Platinum, it's sold WAY more than 5 million copies?
 * For multi-disc sets, the RIAA counts each disc as one unit towards certification. Trivialist (talk) 17:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I have access to the RIAA database here, at the time that was written, 5.8 million USA copies moved as the article states, 11X platinum was the worldwide sales at the time the article info was added. Still shows 11 million copies worldwide and not updated since late 2004 so it's probably somewhat more then that now. Status4 (talk) 03:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Up! (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090307121354/http://www.ifop.com:80/europe/index.asp to http://www.ifop.com/europe/index.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130905145245/http://www.fimi.it/classifiche.asp?idtipo_classifica=1 to http://www.fimi.it/classifiche.asp?idtipo_classifica=1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071020033322/http://ifpi.se:80/goldplatinum.aspx to http://www.ifpi.se/goldplatinum.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Up! (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217020143/http://www.disqueenfrance.com:80/certifications/album.asp?forme_certif=8&annee=25 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/certifications/album.asp?forme_certif=8&annee=25
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090303051435/http://www.oricon.co.jp:80/rank/ea/w/ to http://www.oricon.co.jp/rank/ea/w/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Up! (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5aWxoHiRP?url=http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100526094516/http://www.cria.ca/gold/1202_g.php to http://www.cria.ca/gold/1202_g.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131231022618/http://www.austriancharts.at/year.asp?id=2004&cat=a to http://austriancharts.at/year.asp?id=2004&cat=a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Comm perf section "60 weeks" sentence
This sentence: "It stayed in the Top 200 of the Billboard top 200 albums sales chart for more than 60 weeks" – since Shania's chart history says Up! spent 93 weeks on the BB 200/Top Albums Sales charts, should the sentence be updated to say it spent over 90 weeks on the BB 200 (w the chart history ref attached), or should the sentence just be removed altogether since there's no period or as of date mentioned to indicate when the 60 wks is referring to? I was about to add a ref then realized I'm not sure what the best course of action is. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)