Talk:Up All Night (One Direction album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (public) (talk · contribs) 08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll review. Thine  Antique   Pen   (public)  08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation links
Per toolserver.
 * Another World
 * Payne
 * Styles
 * Stand Up
 * I Wish
 * Taken
 * Na Na Na
 * More than This
 * More Than This
 * Done, some IP came and linked to everything for a reason- delinked and disambiguated for More Than This. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Dead external links

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Have replaced all dead refs with new ones. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)


 * TAP, do you mind if I become a guest reviewer?  TheSpecialUser TSU 15:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Once I'm done, you can. I'll drop you a line when I am. Thine   Antique   Pen   (public)  15:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Lead
Looks good, no issues. All content in the lead is contained in the article. Thine  Antique   Pen   (public)  15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Background
"to an £2 million" -> "to a £2 million" Thine   Antique   Pen   (public)  15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Just to note, I won't be able to correct queries until Friday 17 August 2012. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Commercial performance
Random short sentence at the end, please include somewhere else. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Done added to top of section. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Everything else
Everything else looks good, and seems to be of GA quality. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Good work! Passed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)