Talk:Up Out My Face/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

I willl take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Ref 9 (the Eminem book) needs an ISBN number
 * Added. — Calvin999
 * Ref 25 - can we get a date on it?
 * There isn't one. — Calvin999
 * Earwigs is ok


 *  Copyright 2009 Rye Songs which is administered by Songs of Universal (BMI)/WB Music Publishing (ASCAP/Songs of Peer/March 9 Publishing (ASCAP). - is this a sentence? It has no verb in the main clause...
 * I've made it into a more complete sentence. — Calvin999
 * A club music song which lasts for three minutes, forty-one seconds, its instrumentation makes use of a "thumping" marching band coda - problem here is the change of subject from "song" to "instrumentation". Needs a rejig to align subjects. (watch what I do and see if you like it.) - like this
 * Thanks. — Calvin999  08:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 *  but Carey has always "vehemently" denied - no need to use and quote this word, use something like "strenuously", "strongly", "firmly", "emphatically" etc.
 * Changed. — Calvin999  10:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Surely the last segment of the Production and composition, which is all the folks' views of the lyrics should go in reception?
 * No because they are commenting on the composition. — Calvin999  10:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough I guess. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd add the date of the release of the remix with minaj into the lead, which is a bit short...
 * I have? — Calvin999  10:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - just waiting on last couple....nearly there Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Where are the last couple? — Calvin999  10:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Never mind - I goofed on the lead and explanation for other is fine. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) — <b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>  11:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)