Talk:Upanishads/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: found and fixed seven. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: one found and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Stray sentence at the end of the lead needs to be consolidated with the preceding paragraph.
 * The lead does not fully summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Citation needed tags from August 2010 need addressing.
 * I added one more citation needed tag. After this, the Upanishads were rapidly translated into Dutch, Polish, Japenese and Russian
 * Assume good faith for off-line sources, sources appear reliable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 *  The oldest of these, the Brihadaranyaka and Chandogya Upanishads, were composed during the pre-Buddhist era of India Needs a date as the reader may not be familiar with the pre-Bhuddist era.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine, thanks for fixing those issues. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine, thanks for fixing those issues. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Update
I've addressed the GA review recommendations in the following manner:

GA criterion 1(b)
 * Updated lead to include a summary of praise and criticism for completeness
 * Merged the stray sentence withe the paragraph above it

GA criterion 2(a)
 * Provided citations or deleted content with tags for which I have not been able to find sources

GA criterion 3(a)
 * Provided the dates of Buddhas birth and death for defining the term "pre-Buddhist" Zuggernaut (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)