Talk:Upper Colorado water resource region

Refimprove tag Sep 2018
I noticed you suggested the article needed more sources for its claims, were there any claims in particular that you felt needed more sourcing? I'd be happy to get more sourcing, but the only thing I could imagine needed more sourcing was the second paragraph. -Furicorn (talk) 04:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * hi! You've hit the nail on its head! The only paragraph I had a problem with was the second one, as, the claims in it weren't supported by inline citations, but, now, as you have added a citation for the claims, feel free to remove the refimprove tag. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 05:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC); edited 05:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC).
 * Sidenote — I would suggest that you merge two paragraphs (whichever ones you please) and trim down the number of paragraphs in the article from three to two. Just a suggestion, though, nothing more, nothing less. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 05:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * OK glad to know I can remove the tag. Thanks for the suggestion, I will allow someone else to WP:FIXIT :). -Furicorn (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * haha! No issue. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 05:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)