Talk:Upper nobility

Mistakes
Országh de Guth and Komploth de Nána are the correct forms in the reference. --Csesznekgirl (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Split references from footnotes
Please consider using note tags and a new section to separate the inline references from personal comments/notes. Lajbi  Holla @ me  10:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Lead was too long, now too short)
I've shortened the lead (as per [lead too long] tag) and put the remains under a "Upper nobility" heading. However, it now probably needs fleshing out. — Msmarmalade (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 09:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)