Talk:Uranium mining in the United States

Tailings?
I'm thinking that a search of an article on US uranium mining should find the word 'tailings'. Preferably followed by an overview/history of how well they're cleaned up, or not cleaned up, how well they're managed, or not, and some of the many problems created by tailings piles left out in the open over the decades that U mining was widespread. All over. Articles like this might explain why that inclusion is appropriate. Similarly, many mines are left open and unprotected. There were over 140 of those in South Dakota alone. The current article is too cavalier about these hazards. Twang (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

National Research Council report
The National Research Council released a report on Uranium Mining in Virginia on December 19, 2011. I'd like to update the article to include this. I propose adding the following text:


 * The National Research Council study, funded indirectly by a $1.4 million grant from Virginia Uranium to the Commonwealth, resulted in a report released in December 2011.


 * The report identified a range of health and environmental issues and related risks that could result from uranium mining in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The report found that although there are internationally accepted best practices to mitigate some risks, Virginia faces “steep hurdles” if it is to undertake uranium mining and processing within a regulatory setting that appropriately protects workers, the public, and the environment.


 * Uranium mining and processing carries with it a range of potential health risks to the people who work in or live near uranium mining and processing facilities. Some of these health risks apply to any type of hard rock mining or other large-scale industrial activity, but others are linked to exposure to radioactive materials. In addition, uranium mining has the potential to impact water, soil, and air quality, with the degree of impact depending on site-specific conditions, how early a contaminant release is detected by monitoring systems, and the effectiveness of mitigation steps.


 * Some of the worker and public health risks could be mitigated or better controlled through modern internationally accepted best practices, the report says. In addition, if uranium mining, processing, and reclamation were designed, constructed, operated, and monitored according to best practices, near- to moderate-term environmental effects should be substantially reduced, the report found.


 * However, the report noted that Virginia’s high water table and heavy rainfall differed from other parts of the United States — typically dry, Western states — where uranium mining has taken place. Consequently, federal agencies have little experience developing and applying laws and regulations in locations with abundant rainfall and groundwater, such as Virginia. Because of Virginia’s moratorium on uranium mining, it has not been necessary for the Commonwealth’s agencies to develop a regulatory program that is applicable to uranium mining, processing, and reclamation.


 * The report also noted the long-term environmental risks of uranium tailings, the solid waste left after processing. Tailings disposal sites represent potential sources of contamination for thousands of years.  While it is likely that tailings impoundment sites would be safe for at least 200 years if designed and built according to modern best practices, the long-term risks of radioactive contaminant release are unknown.


 * The report’s authoring committee was not asked to recommend whether uranium mining should be permitted, or to consider the potential benefits to the state were uranium mining to be pursued. It also was not asked to compare the relative risks of uranium mining to the mining of other fuels such as coal.

Best, Earlgrey101 (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I have not seen the report, but the above looks good to me. It would be especially good if you could provide cites within the report for various facts mentioned above. Plazak (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Uranium mining in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705225824/http://www.ucoreuranium.com/bokan.asp to http://www.ucoreuranium.com/bokan.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 09:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Link for extra information on South Dakota
The Rapid City Journal did a long detailed series of articles on the mining near Edgemont, SD. I don't know really what to add or how to add it, but some of the information seems like it should be referenced, especially since some of the states have links to further information about uranium mining in that particular state, but South Dakota doesn't really. I'm hoping someone who is more familiar with Wikipedia markup can make some sense of this and add to the article. The link to the newspaper series is at. Cardweaver (talk) 05:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)