Talk:Urbach–Wiethe disease

Good Article nomination
The article is excellent, follows the guidelines of WP:MEDMOS properly. I only have 2 minor suggestions:


 * A few words might be too scientific for readers such as amygdalectomized.
 * There are no external links while these could be useful: Who Named It, [wwwlb.aub.edu.lb/~webderm/downloads/cases/15.pdf case presentation in pdf]

That's all I think is needed to meet the Good Article criteria.

Thank you!

NCurse work 08:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * In addition to explaining medical terms used in this article (i.e., fulfilling GA criterion 1b with regard to jargon), I would also add any available images relevant to Urbach-Wiethe disease per GA criterion 6 (see WP:GACR). Although a graphic of chromosome 1 is informative, it would be even better to have a picture showing the effects of this disease on either gross or microscopic anatomy. Also, per WP:LEADCITE (part of criterion 1b), consider removing redundant citations to material in the lead that is non-controversial or not especially complex.  With eleven citations (several of which appear more than once) in the lead, that section seems slightly cluttered relative to GA convention.


 * I would have reviewed this article for GA, but I did some significant editing for style a few weeks ago that could be reasonably interpreted as a conflict of interest. Emw2012 (talk) 02:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Review is closed. Due to the lack of editors who could address the last minor requests, it doesn't pass the GA criteria now. NCurse work 20:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)