Talk:Urban water management in Bogotá

May 2010 informal review
This article has various problems in its current form:
 * It conflates parts of Bogotá's article like economy and geography sections and even the infobox, I suggest merging those and Water management background into a history section.
 * It conflates past, present and future and has lots of duplication. History and Future developments sections would solve it.
 * It's very poorly referenced.
 * Sections don't follow convention; some can be merged (Legal initiatives, Multi-stakeholder assistance) and Institutional framework should be removed, it would form stubs for articles on those subject (EAAB).
 * Panoramic should be removed, it's too big and adds little value.

Any comments? --Canaima (talk) 06:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)