Talk:Uriarra Village, Australian Capital Territory

See [] for NSW.

180.200.145.21 (talk) 02:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm concerned that this article is now just being used as a platform for solar farm campaigning. WP is NOTNEWS, and I think we can easily note that the solar farm is being considered, and report the outcome when decided, without having to list every article and news story on the solar farm while the decision is in play. --Inas (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Inas, the article is about the village Uriarra and not the ongoing dispute of the village with ACT government. Although more information is always better, there is quite a bit of repetition and excessively detailed quotes from different party political positions. It should be enough to say that there are ongoing disputes and maybe list the avenues through which the village is seeking to delay/abort solar farm development. --Fincle (talk) 23:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)