Talk:Urmila

Requested move 4 January 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 14:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Urmila (Ramayana) → Urmila – Ramayana word not needed -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  18:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Not clear - if removing (Ramayana) is an advantage, and Urmila is the primary topic in books, then the Urmila dab page would perhaps be moved to Urmila (name). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose no rationale provided for deleting the destination and merging it into a hatnote here. No rationale provided on why the disambiguator is not needed. So, this move request fails at having a rationale, since a different topic exists at the destination. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Urmila was originally a redirect to Urmila (Ramayana) before I added another link to it and converted it into a disambig. But later I noticed that Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count]) '' 05:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support - it is an obvious primary use, unless there is someone now better known than the character in the Ramayana. Imc (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per IMC. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.