Talk:Ursuline Convent riots

Heading
What we have looks nicely formatted, but the section on the riot itself is just a heading. I added hist-stub. RJFJR 17:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm coming back to that, thanks. Been busy at work. -- MatthewDBA 12:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the requirements of the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "World History-Americas" articles. I made several corrections throughout the article. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a good article. The article would benefit from any image if one is available. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have edited the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand the last "Historical Interest in the Events" section. It reads as if someone is making an editorial POV statement in the text. If there's something to say about the scholarship on the subject, it should be stated explicitly so that anyone reading the article can understand it.

MarkinBoston (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)