Talk:User activated soft fork

Untitled
As far as I can tell, the acronym USAF has no meaning in the context of cypto$. Instead, it appears to be a common typo/misspelling of UASF. For example,
 * "The BIP (still without any number) recommends an User-Activated Soft Fork or USAF on August 1st"

I propose to add a sentence to this effect at UASF and USAF_(disambiguation), unless someone who knows more about this topic than I do tells me that USAF stands for an actual thing in the context of crypto$, other than the United States Air Force.

E-hadj (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Correct, USAF is a typo and has nothing to do with this subject. – JonathanCross (talk) 01:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

No RS notability
There appears to be no evidence of real-world notability at all for this - literally every source was crypto news sites and user-generated content. Maybe there were passing mentions in news coverage at the time?

Until and unless we can find something substantial to source this as a standalone article, I've redirected this to Bitcoin_scalability_problem - perhaps there's somewhere better - David Gerard (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)