Talk:Utah State Route 103/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * There is some WP:OVERLINKing at work here. All of the references do not need links to UDOT. Only the first link needs it. Also, there needs to be a WP:NBSP between 22,525 and cars.
 * ✅ -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Broad enough for .225 miles of highway that is only 43 years old.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No photos. I'd like to see something to illustrate the article at some point.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some minor fixes and it will pass.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some minor fixes and it will pass.

Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Issues fixed and passed Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)