Talk:Utah State Route 279/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 279/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

A high-quality article, but there are some minor issues. I've put the article on-hold for those issues to be addressed. Good luck, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Wow thanks for the fast review, and the kind words. I believe I have addressed your concerns, as well as fixed a couple of minor errors I just notices. Please advise if you have additional concerns. Dave (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great, looks much better. Passes GA without hesitation. Good work! Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)