Talk:Utah State Route 96

Assessment
Article now has at least a start on all of the following, lead-in, route description, history, intersection list, infobox. I think this merits Start-class. Go ahead and revert if you disagree. DeFaultRyan (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's definitely at start; some would say it's up at C-class (too bad UDOT doesn't have a history PDF on this route). I'll be expanding the RD when I get a faster internet connection so it's up to C. CL — 21:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm going to promote this to C, I'm guessing no one will challenge this (I hope at least). Cheers - CL — 05:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hopefully the history could get a little bit more at some point, but yeah, this merits a C in my book. -- Kéiryn (talk) 07:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)