Talk:Uważam Rze

Michlic
This text: Joanna Michlic notes that Uważam Rze Historia served as one of the many venues where "right-wing ethno-nationalistic historians" promulgated an ahistorical view of Polish history esp. concerning Polish culpability in the Holocaust.[6] is not supported by the source.

There's nothing in the source of Uwazam Rze as "serving as a venue" for anything.  Volunteer Marek  03:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * User:TrangaBellam I don't understand your edit summary here since obviously I *did* use the t/p.  Volunteer Marek   06:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not understand why the edit-summary field auto-completes, using previously used ones. I meant for you to see my reply which was being formulated at the t/p. Since, your assertion —There's nothing in the source of Uwazam Rze as "serving as a venue" for anything.— appears to be untrue. Obviously, you can contest my edit on grounds of DUE, etc., which are rather subjective criterion. Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but again, the idea that it "served as a venue" is OR. The text is referring to "individual historians" and this magazine is only mentioned in... the footnote (again). I mean, Tom Cotton has published op-eds in the New York Times - but you can't say that "The New York Times served as one of the many venues where "right-wing politicians" promulgated ... whatever it is that Tom Cotton promulgates". We really shouldn't be writing articles on the basis of what's in footnotes.   Volunteer Marek   08:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Scholar X says:
 * Your position is we cannot write in our article on Theta that it has served as a venue for propagation of ABC? Interesting. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The source doesn't say "has been especially featured in press".  Volunteer Marek   16:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The source doesn't say "has been especially featured in press".  Volunteer Marek   16:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)