Talk:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Improve the non-free use rationale of the poster with this template.
 * Don't use small font in the infobox per MOS:SMALLFONT.
 * Resolve the issue with the "[pronunciation?]" tag in the first sentence.
 * "TV series" "television series"
 * "was released" "premiered"
 * Try moving some references here to #Production per MOS:TVLEAD.
 * Add (2014–2019) after Diriliş: Ertuğrul.
 * "why the TV series is gaining" "why the television series gained"
 * I'm not sure whether the first part of the sentence beginning with "One of the reasons" is necessary (I would remove it).
 * The second mention of Emre Konuk should just be Konuk.

Synopsis and cast

 * These sections look great.

Episodes

 * The article titled "List of Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu episodes" should not exist [yet]. Merge it back into this article per MOS:TVSPLIT, which states that "it would take between 50 and 60 episodes to warrant separating those summaries off the main page to an List of Episodes page."
 * After doing so, add episode summaries for every episode that has aired so far (in your own words).

Production

 * I don't believe the quote block template is necessary, so I suggest adding it instead to the end of the sentence.
 * "show. In which, Gülsoy said" "show, in which Gülsoy said"
 * "casted" "cast"
 * Remove "skilfully" (not a neutral word).

Reception

 * Add a "Critical response" header/subsection.
 * Expand this section with the help of WP:RECEPTION.
 * "gaining popularity for the casting of famous actors" is trivial. Most shows get popular due to the actors in them so it's not that important.
 * Don't use small font in the table per MOS:SMALLFONT.

Comments

 * , firstly, I don't know where to comment so please move this to the appropriate area if necessary. I can't find much information at all for a critical response section. I checked almost every website (Hürriyet, Sözcü, etc.) but they're either plot summaries or an actor's (or the person a character is historically based on) biography. Is this section absolutely necessary? Limorina (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The subsection is necessary, but what you have now is fine. Just add a header and take care of the rest of my suggestions and/or add comments. When you do, ping me again so I can take a look at your progress.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've done most of the things you have told me to do. I just have to date the citations. It's a bit hard trying to find plot summaries and I don't know if I can do it in two days. The author information for the citations is pretty unclear too for some of them. Limorina (talk) 20:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries! Since most of my suggestions have been already been addressed, I am passing the article (just try to remove references from the lead already mentioned in other sections per MOS:LEAD). Great work!  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)