Talk:Uyarndha Manithan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Lede
 * "The film's soundtrack and background score were composed by M. S. Viswanathan, while the lyrics for the film's" -you can remove both instances of "film's"
 * ✅ as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * "with the release prints being 4,591 m (15,062 ft) long" -no need to mention in lede.
 * ✅ I followed the ledes of other GAs I had done but I have nevertheless removed it as per your suggestion. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It would be OK ro mention it in discussing production, but I think it looks a bit awkward to say it on release.♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Dr. Blofeld: I have written it in the production section. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What I meant was if there was a bit mentioning the production of the film in the lede you could mention it within that, but as there isn't don't worry.


 * Plot
 * "to retain any job that he gets selected" -awkward, try just "to retain a job".
 * ✅ written as "to retain any job". Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * "teir love"
 * ✅ as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * "Raju throws Sathyamurthy out of Raju's house despite Sathyamurthy proclaiming his innocence. "- add comma after house.
 * ✅ as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Production
 * "a deicision" -typo :-)
 * ✅ as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

I took care of the rest.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Just added it to the GA film list after Thunderbirds Are Go LOL. who'd have thought!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Dr. Blofeld: Haha. Thank you once again for conducting the review. It was very swift and smooth as well. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you caught me at the right time on this, first thing in the morning, and in some of the past reviews I had a ton of FA reviews and peer reviews to do or was just really busy, hence the delay. Keep up the good work, let me know when you want another reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Dr. Blofeld: Most definitely, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)