Talk:VIA Eden

Do we really need this page?
So Eden is a lower clocked C3/C7 with no fan. Do we really need a new page to make that point? Comments. Timharwoodx 23:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I think this page is necessary, as I would like to know whether the EDEN C7 which are featured in the HP thin clients include support for Via's padlock technology. Do you know if it does? -- informedbanker 17:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC), it appears that they do: "VIA Eden processors are helping to herald an era of practical pervasive security thanks to the VIA PadLock Security Engine, the world’s fastest x86 security engine in the world featuring the most comprehensive suite of tools for key cryptographic operations." from the Via EDEN page linked on the VIA Eden article.

Fair use rationale for Image:VIA Eden logo.jpg
Image:VIA Eden logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

what architecture is this processor x86 32bit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.57.159 (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)