Talk:VI Airlink

Contested deletion
I think by now there is at least a credible claim that this company is notable, so it should not be speedy deleted. --AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I noticed that there are other pages linking to VI Airlink, most notably Terrance B. Lettsome International Airport. Therefore, if VI Airlink would be deleted, this would create red links. In my opinion this is a loss of information, because a reader of the airport destination list would not get any information about the airline. Thus, I think the airticle should stay. (I know, this is not an argument... but there are numerous articles here covering similarily small airlines, for example (just to name three) FLN Frisia Luftverkehr, L-3 Flight International Aviation or European Executive) AdAstra reloaded (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That argument is not really effective. If this is not notable, it should not be wikilinked in those articles. --Crusio (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)