Talk:VMFA(AW)-225

Command element section
I am reluctant to keep the CE section that was added. It will forever be changing, if it is done for one it should for all and I just don't think it is feasible. I understand the importance of the XO and SgtMaj to a unit but as far as encyclopedic knowledge is concerned I feel that CO is the only one that is truly important. Interested to hear other thoughts.--Looper5920 00:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree - the problem is that it is known in advance that this information will be incorrect within a reasonably short period (i.e. a few years at best) and after that, unless diligently updated, will provide misleading information to anybody checking this entry. I could see that one would want to keep a historic record of the CO of a unit, in which case the years of command should be indicated. ThreeBlindMice 03:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)