Talk:Vaan (Final Fantasy)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria G'day, mates! I am going to take a look at this article and see if there's any problems. Meanwhile, here's my first impression on the articles:
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * The prose is well-written.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * I have a doubt about the FF Shrine interview. The original source is at IGN, so you may want to replace that.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Replaced reference.Tintor2 (talk) 13:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I've gone ahead and made a pass on it. Nice work, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)