Talk:Vakkalagadda

Untitled
I disgaree with most of the statements in this article. This is totally biased. Please provide the appropriate citations for the statements — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 20:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Citation needed
Please provide the appropriate citations or please remove those contradictory statements which cause damage to the existing political parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 01:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Under the rule of TDP 1. In 2008, Vakkalagadda got Nirmal puraskar award. http://nirmalgrampuraskar.nic.in/NGP2010Static/PDF/SummaryPRI/Total/Total_2008GP.pdf 2. All the school buildings are renovated. 3. Plantation was done to the maximum extent. If you are from vakkalagadda, You can see this on either side of roads. 4. Roads were laid for the gudems, BC colony and even in most parts of the village. 5. Park, temple, shopping complexes were built.

Before commenting, Please visit vakkalagadda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.8.220.34 (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Please provide valid references
Wikipedia is all about providing valid proofs. It is not about visiting the village and seeing all those developments over there. All the references you provided are not valid enough to show whatever mentioned is correct. Please provide valid references or remove those contradictory statements.

Ppinnam (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Almost from the last 20 years, Vakkalagadda Is under TDP rule. It took me in a surprise by your statement that, the award given in 2008 is for the activities done by CPI 15 years ago???

If you still feel that it is CPI which did all the development activities, please provide one valid reference in support of your statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.8.220.34 (talk) 06:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Citation need to be there for statements in Wikipedia
Development is an ongoing process. We cannot attribute success to a single group. Let's say tomorrow someone else is going to come to power and they just can't take the credit for the whole development unless it is a big revolutionary change. The result might be because of the ground work layed by the predecessors.

Since I can't provide a valid reference I am not going to give an one-sided statement in a site like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a personal blog to express one's own ideas. So, if you can't provide a valid reference, Please don't put statements like "There is no development under CPI rule". You can have a neutral statement instead.

Bottomoline: Reference needed.

Ppinnam (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)