Talk:Valid but unlawful

Duplication
Note that there are articles at Valid but ilicit and Valid but illicit. I believe the latter is the proper spelling. I Suggest a merge and redirect. Gimmetrow 14:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You're quite right. I don't know how I missed that. It was moved from Valid but unlawful only today. I don't want to move Valid but ilicit to Valid but illicit, as there's already an article there, but I might move it back to Valid but unlawful, (which would keep the history intact) delete this page with the incorrect spelling, and post the contents of this article into the talk page of Valid but illicit, so that people can decide what, if anything, they want to add. AnnH ♫ 14:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)