Talk:Valletta F.C.

Fair use rationale for Image:Valletta-FC.png
Image:Valletta-FC.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This article is written using poor English - editing needed throughout
The article on Valletta F.C. is useful and informative - thanks go to the author for the contribution. However, the standard of English used to write it is very poor throughout and is confusing, misleading and at times incomprehensible. It would be appropriate for the article to be overhauled from top to bottom, perhaps by the author her/himself or someone known by/acceptable to the author with a better command of the language.

As it is, unfortunately, it reads like an amateur piece by a Valletta enthusiast rather than the neutral, authoritative piece on this grand old club that it could and should be.

Chris at 194.128.108.131 (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully somewhat improved now
I hope my edits have made it a bit more neutral and improved the worst examples of poor English. But more work will definitely be needed. Malta1978 (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)