Talk:Vampire (Olivia Rodrigo song)/Archive 1

Background
I just removed a paragraph of information regarding Rodrigo's debut album since it has nothing to do with Vampire, a song from her second album - however, it was reinstated under the guise of being "disruptive". I think my removal and the question I raised was valid, since a single from her second album only warrants a brief mention of her first body of work at most. What do others think? – Meena • 18:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There are currently four lines in the article detailing Rodrigo's success with her first album that directly lay context for the expectations from this single as the follow-up. It is more than fine. "a single from her second album only warrants a brief mention of her first body of work at most" is not stated by any guideline and seems to be something you have made up.--NØ 18:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I never said it was a guideline, just what I think. I also think it's ref bombing and that the song is notable enough without the puffery para. – Meena • 18:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think that the first sentence about the signing of her record deal and intended EP is necessary. That feels a bit too far removed from this particular single. However, a brief mention of Sour and its singles' successes is a good inclusion. We don't want the background section to become too bloated. — Peterpie123rww (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * That seems more reasonable. Trimmed out that sentence.--NØ 19:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Does anyone have an opinion on whether we should mention all the top-10 singles from Sour or just the number ones?--NØ 22:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I think just the number ones would suffice to be honest. — Peterpie123rww (talk) 09:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)