Talk:Vampire Counts (Warhammer)

General Issues
1) Luthor Harkon IS a Von Carstein Vampire Count, this is viewable in rules available on an english language GW website (cannot remember which) and there is a main page for the Blood Dragons.

2) the History of the Vampire's of Lahamia are incorrect. They were created by Nagash's Elixiar of Blood, which he had been using to prolong his own life. After Nagash was overthrown by the other Priest-kings, the rulers of the city state of Lahamia took Nagash's Elixiar in secret. It was the use of this that caused the vampire's to be born. Their history goes on from there. (95kingc 12:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC))


 * Well, someone (W'Soran) improved the drink in subtle ways, thus making them Vampires - otherwise Nagash would be one as well UltimateNagash 08:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I've just read 'Night's Dark Masters' (published 2007) and with all due respect concerning people's efforts about this article, there are inacurracies in regard of the Vampires's history that hurt my eyes %) If no one minds, I'll gladly correct them in order that no one else gets misled again (like myself, half a year ago :D).

Nagash was never a vampire.....the formula he created was the one used by Neferata to become one, sure. But apparently Nagash's blood dranken by Nagash himself was different. Nagash's physical transformation was a result of his years of unholy rituals and studies and learnings, both from that Dark Elf Sorceress he captured as well as the demons he was able to summon to continue to learn from (ostensibly, probably demons of Tzeenech, Nurgle and Slannesh...can't imagine Khorne demons would ever aid). That plus the Warpstone he found in Cripple Peak turned him into what he did.

Your right about there being discrepencies, that is what editing is for. Just make sure you cite the proper sourcebooks and you should be ok on the NO ORGINAL RESEARCH rule. Whippletheduck (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Online Vampire Communities?
This section is obviously just an ad for the site linked within. The site is neither a particularly well-known site or a useful repository of info, so I'm going to go ahead and suggest deletion of the entire section if no one objects. Jdodger 06:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't object - maybe ones like the Blood Keep should be linked instead (I believe they're much more well known) UltimateNagash 08:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Deleted - forums generally don't count as suitable to link to. GraemeLeggett 09:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Jdodger & GraemL. I've got a question for you there, have you checked the External Links @ Warhammer? there are also forums located...
 * And @ UltimateNagash; You believe they're much more well known, purely subjective decision if you ask me...
 * Anywayz, plain stupid if you ask me..... or should it just be named as an External Links thread? --ArcumWTE 11:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)