Talk:Van Morrison: No Surrender/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I changed the wiki-link to the Daily Express, so that it refers directly to Daily Express, it is rarely referred to as just The Express. Feel free to disagree, I don't think it is a Ga issue.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is adequately referenced, I assume good faith for off-line sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Very thorough
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral and balanced
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * And another one, if only all reviews were as easy as this. Congratulations on your writing style and mastery of the elements of writing a good artcile. Passed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * And another one, if only all reviews were as easy as this. Congratulations on your writing style and mastery of the elements of writing a good artcile. Passed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)