Talk:Vanderbilt Triple Palace/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this! —  Ghost River  20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lede

 * "was generally negatively criticized"

Layout and courtyard

 * "Doors separated the three residences, but they could be opened to create a large event space." "The doors separating the three residences could be opened to create a large event space."

Facade

 * Misplaced period after "However, William Henry"

Features

 * Add diacritics and WL on papier-mâché
 * "W.H." "W. H." per MOS:INITIAL (this shows up a few times)

19th century

 * First sentence of Construction uses "lot" singular, whereas the second sentence uses "lots" plural
 * "sixty European sculptors" "60 European sculptors"

20th century

 * "Among the buyers was" "Among the buyers were" since you then go on to list two

Critical reception

 * "was not reviewed positively," "was received coldly"

General comments

 * Earwig score looks good
 * No stability concerns in the revision history
 * Pictures are all public domain (except for one CC0) and relevant

Should be all quick fixes – putting on hold for now. —  Ghost River  21:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review @GhostRiver. I have done all of these. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)