Talk:Vaping

the "misbelief" that e-cigarettes are safer than traditional cigarettes
This is strange that based on one single study, this article say that "thinking that e-cig are safer is a misbelief". The e-cig topic is subject to controversy, so you have to cite systematic review when available.

https://www.nap.edu/resource/24952/012318ecigaretteConclusionsbyEvidence.pdf

Conclusion 5-3. There is substantial evidence that except for nicotine, under typical conditions of use, exposure to potentially toxic substances from e-cigarettes is significantly lower compared with combustible tobacco cigarettes

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-publishes-independent-expert-e-cigarettes-evidence-review

vaping poses only a small fraction of the risks of smoking and switching completely from smoking to vaping conveys substantial health benefits

Namichel (talk) 14:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 28 November 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 16:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Usage of electronic cigarettes → Vaping – Vaping is how people commonly use ecigs Chidgk1 (talk) 13:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This article is horribly written, largely unmaintained, and redundant to the content that's already in electronic cigarette. I suggest that we move this to draft pending a full rewrite for brevity and concision.  Vaping already redirects to electronic cigarette so there's no loss there.—S Marshall T/C 15:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The article is over 4 years old so definitely should not be sent to draft. If it's no good, we should either edit it, merge it to electronic cigarette, or send it to WP:AfD. - Station1 (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Definitely don't merge it to electronic cigarette, because that article already contains everything useful from this article. You're welcome to edit this content to fix it, but personally I won't be doing that because I've already spent enough hours of my life trying to fix QuackGuru's content.  You're also welcome to AfD it.—S Marshall T/C 09:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)