Talk:Vasco SC

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 17 August 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and title consistency. FYI to nominator, this should have been done as one single RM discussion, with all the titles listed. But it's easier to just go ahead and do the moves now. (non-admin closure) — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 10:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Vasco S.C. → Vasco SC – Consistency with current naming conventions in Category:Football clubs in India, Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. Footwiks (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose - one of a mass number of nominations by this editor (at least 16 by my count?!) with no sources presented and no clear category convention to match. GiantSnowman 11:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that? Footwiks (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support for consistency. Nehme1499 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support for consistency. I was the one who actually moved a lot of these articles since Indian clubs en masse do not use the "." in FC, SC, AC etc. Most likely, the articles were titled like that due to original editors copying what is done with the Premier League. The Indian Super League itself doesn't add dots, and neither does the I-League. All other clubs have social media and some news coverage which never uses the dots. The Times of India doesn't use it, outlook india doesn't and even The Hindu does not include them. It's literally something that just does not exist in India or used besides on some wikipedia articles. Makes no sense to include. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)