Talk:Veðrfölnir and eagle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see What is a good article?)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * One grammatical error noted below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Short article but I've reviewed the background and I think it covers everything adequately.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * 2) It is stable.
 * 3) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Notes
 * "may have been influenced by these Asiatic cosmologies from a northern." - there is a missing word here: from a northern what?
 * "...asks High what other notable facts..." - can an adjective be provided indicating who High is? Like "asks the deity High..." or "asks High, a wise deity,...".


 * Both issues fixed. Thanks for reviewing the article! bloodofox: (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks. maclean (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)