Talk:Vedast

POV problems
This article is completely uncritical in its presentation of facts. It accepts, without considering alternate explanations, miracles and faith-healings. It relies heavily on hagiographical rather than historical sources. It presents stories (e.g. instant conversion) without noting that they are commonplaces of narratives of saints' lives. It makes no effort to present alternative explanations or points of view.

--Vicedomino (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Fair points. I have split out the obvious hagiography. Springnuts (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, that's a start anyway. The problem of other points of view has not yet been addressed