Talk:Veigar Páll Gunnarsson transfer 2011

Unclear
So, in order to dodge a 50% sell-on clause, instead of paying 5m kronor for Gunnarsson, they bought him and a kid (who was presumably worth nothing) and pretended that most of the fee was for the kid? I ask because it's not actually stated explicitly in the article, you have to piece it together. It doesn't help that part 1 of the story is in the lede and part 2 below the contents, when *all* of the story should be below the contents, and the lede used as a summary. --81.136.143.173 (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC) I've now tried to rewrote the lead. I hope it is more clear now. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)