Talk:Velvet Revolver/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Swarm   X 14:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Greetings. I'll conduct the good article review for this nomination. I know it's long overdue; I'll have the review completed by today and hopefully it won't prove difficult to promote. A preliminary scan looks good, so bear with me and I'll get the review up ASAP. Regards,  Swarm   X 14:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Criteria check Thanks for your comments! I added a Musical style section here. I hope that is sufficient enough and correct, admittedly I'm not the best at writing those type of sections. HrZ (talk) 13:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Wow, that's a lot of references.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Should have something along the lines of a 'musical style' section. Here's a good example of a short one. Nothing major.
 * ✅. Hope that is good enough? HrZ (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Looks like the article's well monitored as well.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images free.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Other than 3a, everything looks good.  Swarm   X 21:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Other than 3a, everything looks good.  Swarm   X 21:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, good. At least now the article doesn't neglect the topic. It's passed my review is now listed as a good article.  Swarm   X 18:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)