Talk:Velykyi Khodachkiv

Reliable Sources?
There does not appear to be a single reliable source for this article.Faustian (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Looking at the website for the principal source we see the familiar names of discredited "scholars" such as Edward Prus, ALexander Korman and Wiktor Poliszczuk. Speaking of this sort of stuff, Polish historian Rafał Wnuk of the Institute of National Remembrance in Lublin wrote "The third, para-scientific trend consists of works that are of no scientific value. Their authors play freely with historical facts. They appeal mostly to the reader's emotions. Their use of sources and researchers' findings does not contribute to historical discoveries. Instead it is used to make their "true"version of events credible. It is often only politically involved publicism, not historical work. Edward Prus, Aleksander Korman, and Jacek E. Wilczur26are followers of this trend."

Also: "In the third, "non-scientific" trend there is a group represented by E. Prus, A.Korman and J. Wilczor. They all strongly support the idea that one cannot talk about a Polish-Ukrainian conflict, butonly about the genocide of Poles by Ukrainian nationalists. Works by these authors are written in the form of a lampoon. E.Prus's and J.Wilczor's books do not include footnotes and have only bibliographies. This prevents a reader from confirming facts which are often more than doubtful. For instance, in one of his books E.Prus writes that in Sachryn, near Hrubieszow, Ukrainians murdered each other.56However, all of Polish historiography and the memories of Home Army soldiers state clearly that it was an action of Polish underground."

Unless reliable sources are found confirming this stuff, this article probably needs to be deleted.Faustian (talk) 13:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of Polish language sources which confirm the massacre. An atrocity of such scale, with more than 800 murdered, should be described in the Wikipedia. Tymek (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I added few more sources, including the president Lech Kaczynski speech were he refers to the massacre (and we know that he is FAR from being anti-Ukrainian). There is plenty of Polish language sources but I could not find much about it in English.--Jacurek (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * IPN has nothing about the Chodaczkow Wielki massacre (I can't find it anymore) ... --Jacurek (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Are there any scholarly sources confirming the existence of this massacre? The other issue is much of the info about this massacre in this article comes from Korman's work which is clearly not a reliable source.  As I just posted, Rafał Wnuk of the Institute of National Remembrance in Lublin  wrote "The third, para-scientific trend consists of works that are of no scientific value. Their authors play freely with historical facts. They appeal mostly to the reader's emotions. Their use of sources and researchers' findings does not contribute to historical discoveries. Instead it is used to make their "true"version of events credible. It is often only politically involved publicism, not historical work. Edward Prus, Aleksander Korman and Jacek E. Wilczur are followers of this trend."Faustian (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Faustian, I understand your point, but is the opinion of Rafal Wnuk binding here? Historians, like other people, have their likes and dislikes. Just because Wnuk criticized Korman, Prus and Wilczur, does not mean we should not treat their works as scholarly. Wnuk himself and his fellow historian Grzegorz Motyka have often been criticized (especially Motyka) by other Polish scholars for being too pro-Ukrainian. Motyka, who has been kicked out of the National Rememberance Institute, has been called pro-Banderite or plainly Ukrainian-Polish historian.Tymek (talk) 05:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Was Wnuk criticized by historians or by non-historian nationalists such as Korman? Not all opinions are equal. Wnuk's cticism of Korman's work, moreover, was quite strong and is not to be taken lightly.  He is not saying Korman is merely biased, or makes mistakes.  He says No historical value.  This is more than criticism, it's condemnation.  And Wnuk is a very credible historian.  The article that this is quoted in was devoted to an examination of Polish historiography.  These are the words of a Polish expert on this topic, writing specifically about historiagraphy.  Faustian (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Wnuk is not the only one. Yale historian, graduate of Oxford whio also sdtuided in Warsaw, Harvard, Paris and Vienna, and expert on Eastern Europe Timothy D. Snyder writes of Prus : "The propagandistic publications of Edward Prus are indefensible in this regard."  This sort of stuff neeeds to be kept off of wikipedia.Faustian (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * And here is a description of Korman's hoaxing a picture of children murdered by their mother in 1923, claiming that it was the work of UPA: . As I said, let's stick to reliable sources, not Korman or Prus. Faustian (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Faustian, I have too much respect for you to argue with you and as much as I would not like to see Ukrainian crap on Wikipedia, I am sure you would not like to see Polish crap here, and we agree with each other on it. So far I have not been able to find reliable sources describing this massacre, give me a little more time and then we will see about deletion of the article. Surely, there might be books on it, but the internet is blank (except for Korman and Prus). Furthermore, I have found an interview with a man who lived there, he mentions that out of a thousand houses, maybe a hundred remained, but he does not mention any Ukrainian units. He says later Every second or third night, despite that I was a little boy, I had to stand sentry. We had to keep an eye on the banderowcy (members of Ukrainian organisation fighting for independence). The Ukrainians robbed and murdered the Poles, but does not mention the massacre. THe interview in English is here Tymek (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with what you write above. We ought to be careful with testmonies by individuals, without a source to back it up.  As for what was written by this eyewitness, if UPA committed that atrocity than it wasn't the 14th SS Division.  best regardsFaustian (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
Faustian, you have my endorsement if you want to go on and delete the article. There have been enough local massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Podolia, we do not really need a one with sources that are not reliable. Tymek (talk) 02:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't know how to delete articles, but left a message on an administrator's talk page. I appreciate your efforts on this topic.  warmly Faustian (talk) 03:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I do not know how to do it either. Tymek (talk) 04:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a remark on the tag which says There seems to be an agreement on the talk page that we do not need an article per every local massacre. I strongly disagree with this statement, as all massacres should be described. The difference is that e.g. in Belgium during WW2 there were few massacres, while in Volhynia and Podolia alone there were hundreds of such sad events. The only reason for deletion is lack of reliable sources, nothing else. Tymek (talk) 04:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with you 100%.Faustian (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree also. If we have good sources we certainly should have all such articles. For this one, where those whose opinion I must rely on say the sources are borderline, why don;t we merge with the article for the village. DGG (talk) 05:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem is that pretty much all the information in this article is taken from unreliable sources so unless another source is found then I'm not sure if it belongs in any article (unless it's a brief mention and the problem with the source is noted in the article).Faustian (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I declined to delete the article via prod--I suggest again hat you move it, but otherwise it needs community attention. AfD would be the place. DGG (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Is there still a need to delete it anymore after it was moved to the village name? I updated the AfD discussion. I am not sure if the deletion is anymore applicable. --Mokhov (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources Review
Nobody questioned thier books thats enough for me, seriuos historians are basing on his books. They are participating in conferences of historians. Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. Book was published, I dont see any historians criticized their book--Paweł5586 (talk) 22:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC) Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources when available. However, some scholarly material may be outdated, superseded by more recent research, in competition with alternate theories, or controversial within the relevant field. Reliable non-academic sources may also be used, particularly material from reputable mainstream publications. Wikipedia articles should cover all significant views, doing so in proportion to their published prominence among the most reliable sources. The choice of appropriate sources depends on context and information should be clearly attributed where there are conflicting sources. Komański and Siekiera don't meet any of these criteria. It isn't published by a "reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses". It is published by the same publisher that releases all sorts of anti-Ukrainian propaganda by authors such as Korman, etc. It is not a reliable source, sorry.Faustian (talk) 22:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Material that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable; this means published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses.
 * Items that are signed are preferable to unsigned articles.
 * The scholarly acceptance of a source can be verified by confirming that the source has entered mainstream academic discourse, for example by checking the number of scholarly citations it has received in citation indexes. A corollary is that journals not included in a citation index, especially in fields well covered by such indexes, should be used with caution.
 * Isolated studies are usually considered tentative and may change in the light of further academic research. The reliability of a single study depends on the field. Studies relating to complex and abstruse fields, such as medicine, are less definitive. Avoid undue weight when using single studies in such fields. Meta-analyses, textbooks, and scholarly review articles are preferred when available, so as to provide proper context.


 * Sorry but what about 862 dead Poles? They are killed themselves? Rescued still live as well as their families live. So Komański and Siekierka resarch set the exact figure killed people. First read ther book than criticize. Look at Motyka's book, there are many eferences pointed to Siekierka and Komański book.

And one more thing, not all what Prus and Korman wrote was lie. They used anty Ukrainian language (they saw what UPA did on their eyes) but many facts are true.--Paweł5586 (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If the only evidence for the 862 dead Poles is a nonreliable source than it does not belong here. If the 862 figure is true, then find a reliable source that says so. The other "fact" is the allegation that the 14-SS Galician were involved in the alleged massacre. Any reliable source claiming that they were involved in that specific act? As for Prus and Korman, is doesn't matter if "not all what Prus and Korman wrote was lie". The fact is that they are not reliable sources (see first section of this discussion page). Faustian (talk) 22:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Dear Pawel, we have to go for a compromise here. I am sure you would not appreciate unreliable Ukrainian sources on Wikipedia, just like other users do not appreciate some Polish sources. It goes both ways. I have created this article, and now I see that we do not really have solid evidence of this massacre. I am not saying it did not occur, what I mean is that in controversial topics, such as this one, we need something more. Tymek (talk) 22:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Szczepański and Siekierka are reliable source, just read thier book.--Paweł5586 (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * By what criteria are they a reliable source, other than your opinion?Faustian (talk) 22:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Next source by "Extermination of South-east Ends " by Stanisław Żurek: Most victims in assault: 2. Chodaczków Wielki pow. Tarnopol = 862 osoby (faktycznie ponad 1000 osób), w kwietniu 1944 roku, w wyniku napadu SS „Galizien” oraz OUN-UPA;  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paweł5586 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * According to this the author is an artist and medical doctor who fought in a Polish resistance unit. Not a historian.  Zurek's works are published by the same notorious Nortom publishing house that publishes works by other Polish nationalist propagandists such as Korman. Seriously, a reliable source would be welcome but not this stuff.Faustian (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * This is not same person. I got 6 sources about Chodaczków: 1. Szczepański and Siekierka book where u can find exact number of victims, based on recoletions 2. Stanisław Żurek book, 3. Prus (SS-Galizien. Patrioci czy zbrodniarze?) and Korman (A.Korman - "Nieukarane zbrodnie SS-Galizien z lat 1943-1945" - Londyn 1989.) books, 4. Page source, 5. Page source (number of victims), 6. Czesław E. Blicharski Chyba ten eufemizm "działalność rewolucyjna" pokrywa zbrodnie ludobójstwa, dokonane przez "rewolucjonistów" w takich miejscowościach jak np. Chodaczków Wielki z 862 zamordowanymi,  --Paweł5586 (talk) 23:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * As proven above, they are not reliable sources. Yale historian Timothy Snyder actually mentions Prus' work here: : "The propagandistic publications of Edward Prus are indefensible in this regard."  You are not citing reliable sources, sorry. I can probably cite 10 or 100 Ukrainian nationalist sources that claim that Ukrainians didn't kill anybody or that it was all the communists or someone else doing these things. So what?  It's not the number but the reliability of the source that counts. Not just me but Tymek, who created this article, agree that so far there is no reliable source supporting what you are trying to put in the article.Faustian (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * For you this is not reliable source for me its fine. Especially Siekierka, they collected many reccoletions of victims. And tell me why Motyka in Ukraińska Partyzantka are basing on some facts from Siekierka's book? Becouse he finds it as relialbe source. For me Snyder isnt good source, he cant recognize genocide or ethnical cleansing from other things.--Paweł5586 (talk) 23:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not about a source being relaible "for you" or "for me". It is about a source meeting wikiepdia's standards for reliability.  And this one clearly does not, as confirmed not only by me but by Tymek, the creator of this article.Faustian (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Polish News sites about Lwów and SS - Galizien:


 * 1 -  Utworzona na wiosnę 1943 roku z zamieszkujących dawne polskie Kresy Wschodnie ukraińskich ochotników jednostka 14 Dywizja Grenadierów SS wsławiła się głównie polowaniem na partyzantów na Lubelszczyźnie i licznymi masakrami ludności cywilnej. Najbardziej znane z nich to mord dokonany na 868 Polakach w lutym 1944 roku w Hucie Pieniackiej i masakra w Chodaczkowie Wielkim, gdzie zginęły 862 osoby.
 * 2 W Chodaczkowie Wielkim oddział SS "Galizien" zamordował 862 osoby.--Paweł5586 (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Are the authors of the newspaper articles historians? The latter is from a radical nationalist newspaper btw (for English=speakers: the "kresy" stuff seems to be sort of a Polish version of German Danzigers and East Prussians wanting their territory back).Faustian (talk) 04:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You are very unfair to Poles. There is no radical nationalist in Poland in polish-ukrainian relationships. There are sill many Poles living at East. Thats news for them and about them, there is no revisions, no hate in this page. This is not for the comparison to OUN-UPA fans, which are persuading even to kill the priest Isakowicz-Zalewski, who are fighting for the truth and never is against Ukrainians only against nationalist who killed his family.--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I haven't really read that much about this issue so I comment with some hesitation. However, I do agree with the opinion of Lysy here that publications by Nortom should not be used as sources. Additionally, I have some recollection that Leon Kieres and the IPN stated that there was no evidence of Galitzien being involved in this particular massacre. I think that Tymek went out of his way on this one to only use reliable sources and that's exactly how these kinds of articles should be approached.radek (talk) 22:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

It is only published by Nortom! Author and publishing house are form Wrocław. You didnt ansewer about references in Motyka to Siekierka's book. I dont accept your claims.--82.115.88.68 (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Komański & Siekierka as source
The book LUDOBÓJSTWO DOKONANE PRZEZ NACJONALISTÓW UKRAIŃSKICH NA POLAKACH W WOJEWÓDZTWIE TARNOPOLSKIM 1939-1946, Henryk Komański, Szczepan Siekierka was reviewed (noticed) by [http://www.ism.uni.wroc.pl/a_old/zwschode.htm#ba prof. dr hab. Bernard Janusz Albin] and [http://www.inh.uksw.edu.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=15 ks. prof. dr. hab. Józef Mandziuk]. This is notes from historians (in Polish):

'''Z recenzji prof. dr. hab. Bernarda J. Albina:''' „Zbrodnie nacjonalistów ukraińskich na ludności polskiej zamieszkującej południowo-wschodnie Kresy II Rzeczpospolitej w latach II wojny światowej, mimo upływu od tamtych tragicznych wydarzeń sześćdziesięciu lat, wciąż pozostają stosunkowo słabo opisane i zbadane […]Recenzowana praca dokumentalna [….] przygotowana do druku przez Szczepana Siekierę i Henryka Komańskiego, niewątpliwie wychodzi naprzeciw tym potrzebom. […]Nieczęsto spotykana tak znaczna objętość dzieła wydaje się tu jednak uzasadniona, zważywszy na jej wysokie ambicje dokumentalne oraz to, że odnoszą się one do dość rozległego obszaru wybranego województwa i w zasadzie nie mają, poza książką W.i E. Siemaszków traktującego o Wołyniu, odpowiednika w literaturze naukowej […] Mimo pewnej jednostronności jest ona swoistym pomnikiem upamiętniającym nazwiska tych mieszkańców województwa tarnopolskiego, którym odebrano życie tylko dlatego, że byli Polakami, w imię obłędnej i zbrodniczej ideologii ukraińskiego integralnego nacjonalizmu. Jest ona przestrogą dla młodych Polaków i Ukraińców i zarazem cennym wkładem do rozpoczynającego się dialogu polsko-ukraińskiego oraz budowy podstaw do rzeczywistego pojednania, które może nastąpić poprzez obnażenie całej prawdy o współczesnej przeszłości […]

'''Z recenzji ks. prof. dr. hab. Józefa Mandziuka:''' „Nie można bowiem budować stosunków między narodami, zwłaszcza sąsiadami, na kłamstwie i niedomówieniach. Jednak temat zbrodni popełnionych przez Ukraińców na polskiej ludności kresowej nadal był konsekwentnie pomijany i przemilczany. Prezentowane dzieło oceniam bardzo pozytywnie. Posiada ono najwyższą rangę w naszej bibliografii i z pewnością spełni pokładane w nim nadzieje w przyszłych stosunkach z Ukrainą. Uchroni od zapomnienia tych, którzy ponieśli śmierć z rąk Ukraińców […]--Paweł5586 (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Could you translate this for the benefit of Enlish-speaking editors? The first prfessor admits that the book you cite is "one-sided." ("Mimo pewnej jednostronności jest ona swoistym pomnikiem upamiętniającym nazwiska tych mieszkańców województwa tarnopolskiego...", use google translate). The second professor is a priest at a university that was a communist-era Roman Catholic Seminary. More importantly, neither of these sources, in the quotes you provided, endorsed the specific facts you are trying to place into the article.  Do either of these professors confirm the specific events you seek to place in the article?Faustian (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You didnt read the book thats why you dont understant it. This book has two parts - one part (short at begining) is general basics about the general situation - OUN, UPA, SS-Galizien... This is that part, first professor writting about, second part (above 800 p.) is description of events. This descripcion is basing on recolections which was published in Karta Center. Motyka used this facts in his book, he added some references to Siekierka's book. Look at second say: " This book got highest rank in our bibliography". I can send you pages from this book - read informations about Huta Pieniacka - its the same what Polish Instytue of Membrance established.--Paweł5586 (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If Motyka mentioned Chodaczkow Wielki then include that in this article and there isn't a problem. Unfortunately that hasn't been the case.  We can use stuff that Motyka or other relaible sources have taken from this work, but justbecause they took some stuff from this work doesn't mean that the work itself is reliable.  Motyka can judge what parts of the source are good, we cannot and must defer to the experts.Faustian (talk) 22:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * And I got 8 sources about number of victims and participation SS-Galizien. --Paweł5586 (talk) 16:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You can have 800, if they are not reliable sources the number is irrelevent. All we need is one reliable source. Unfortunately so far there isn't one.Faustian (talk) 22:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks to you, will be more articles about SS-Galizien massacres, I will make them for you. First is Pidkamin massacre next, today will be Palikrowy massacre. You will see more truth about your "heroes". As I said sources are reliable, you didnt answer my words. First, references in Motyka to Siekierka's book (not about Chodaczków but about Palikrowy, Pidkamin) which means that their book are reliable, Second: book is reviewed by historians. Third: This book is based on reccoletions published in Karta Center. 4: I got many another sources, with number of victims mentioned.--Paweł5586 (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You seem to be treating this as a sporting event with numbers, winners and losers. We are trying to build an encyclopedia here, based on reliable sources. As long as its reliable, the more information the better, whether it be about the SS-Galizien or whomever. So far, about this specific alleged event, there isn't one. If I wanted to treat wikipedia like you do, I would find a wealth of informtion found from UPA sources, sources that are also referenced by historians. But I don't do that - unless the historian himself says something based on that source, I don't use the info.  So unless a historian specifically mentions Chodaczkow Wielki it doesn't go in. Faustian (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You even not trying answer questions and statements I have asked in previus comment. Thats why I dont accept your claims. OUN-UPA sources are extremely unrelibale becouse they partcipated in crimes. They are trying to excuse their crimes. In other side is polish resarchers work based on recolections people who surviwed. They are not nationalist just people which commemorate crimes.--Paweł5586 (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Historians are using his book as source but thats not enough for Wikipedia? I'm afraid you are trying to whitewashing SS-Galizien. Thats why I will write some new articles about their crimes.--Paweł5586 (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Historians may use parts of those books. Wikipedia editors are not historians.  When wikipedia editors judge what parts of sources are or are not reliable, this is called No original research. The "Polish researchers" you cite are from Polish nationalist publishers who publish stuff like Korman's or Prus's work (see above for how they are judged by real historians). Again, if Motyka used Komanski's work to describe Chodaczkow Wielki  then of course it belongs in the article.  But unfortunately he hasn't.13:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I said again there is no nationalists publishers in Poland in Polish-Ukrainian relationships, there is a Polish Society for the Remembrance of the Victims of Crimes Committed by Ukrainian Nationalists. You dont know it, dont understand it, you dont read it. This book has been written about 10-15 years! Was published 3 years ago, and have about 1200 pages. Its big, solid book. Contains direct reccolections of eye-witnesses. And was reviewed by historians.--Paweł5586 (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's great that you claim there are no nationalist publishers in Poland. I guess we could say the same about Ukraine.  Why do you feel that the size of a book makes it more reliable? One of the reviews you cited called the book "one sided." I urge you to review No original research and  Reliable Sources to see how this book should be treated.Faustian (talk) 14:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You twist my words, i have said there is no nationalists publishers in Poland in Polish-Ukrainian relationships. For sure Siekierka isn't nationalist.--Paweł5586 (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Seriously, I have no idea what to say now. My opinion is that we need some more reliable sources, and I think we need some uninvolved administrator here. He/she will be presented the sources provided, to determine if they are valid or not. And Faustian is right. This is not a sporting event here, with jugglers playing with articles, or putting them on scales to determine which is heavier. History needs to be described, all events, sad or not, should be remembered, but not as a revenge. Future generations must see to it, so that nothing like the Volhynian Genocide happens again. And to achieve it, the Poles, the Ukrainians, the Russians, the Germans, must start to listen to each other and understand each other. Tymek (talk) 00:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I am afraid, Faustian dont belive in massacres of Poles commited by SS-Galizien (4-5 regiments). Thats why I have made new articles about Podkamień and Palikrowy. My family came from Volhynia and trust me I dont treat it as sport. I have heard the truth on my own ears from eye-witnesses. Future generations must see to it thats why I will make some articles. And one more thing I respect Ukrainians, they saved my family I dont treat UIA, SS-Galizien as ordinary Ukrianians but as nationalists - fascists. They made many lies thats why Ukrainians belive they were fighting for free, indepented Ukraine. The truth is that UIA figting for fascist state where werent any place for Polish, Jews, and Ukrainians who wanted demokracy. --Paweł5586 (talk) 07:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Aleksander Korman - Reliable Source?
Aleksander Korman - Reliable Source? Check out http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksander_Korman or Google translate at http://translate.google.ca/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=y&u=http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksander_Korman&sl=pl&tl=en&history_state0=

Bobanni (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Rafal Wnuk unequivocally considers Korman unreliable.Galassi (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Where is Chodaczków Wielki?

 * 1) I can't find it on the map.
 * 2) Is there an entry for this event on Polish Wiki or Ukrainian Wiki?
 * 3) Is this village, which is supposed to be near Ternopil, in Volyn? If not, can it be part of the Volyn tragedy, or should there be a name change?
 * 4) The Galizien diviaion were apparently in training at that time and were only engaged to the front in July. How come they were in Eastern Ternopil ares in April?

҃--Bandurist (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Find here, south-east from Tarnopol, it was Tarnopol Voivodeship not Volhynia. PL Wiki - Chodaczków Wielki, Ukr Wiki Великий Ходачків. Massacresz of Poles werent only at Volhynia but also in Tarnopol, Lwów and Stanisławów (Iwano Frankowsk) Voivodeships.--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for proving that elements of the Galicia Divison could not have been involved with this alleged massacre. At the time of the alleged massacre parts of it were stationed near Zamosc and the rest near Brody (according to Michaelis, Rolf "Esten, Russen und Ukrainer in der Waffen-SS" ISBN 3938392258 Winkelried-Verlag 2006), both locations being very far away (around 240 km and 80 km, respectively, according to googlemaps) from eastern Ternopil oblast. The problem with basing articles on unreliable sources as you have been doing is that you end up with articles that fall apart with scrutiny.Faustian (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Dont be ridiculous, it was small unit not entire regiment.--Paweł5586 (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * How small was it? Got numbers?Galassi (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I dont know, sources dont mention. During pacification, German soldier came with order to stop the action. This unit are going to support Tarnopol forces, there is suggestion that this action was prepared with local OUN command--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Galican Divison were never based in Ternopil so if this alleged unit was going to support Ternopil forces it wasn't part of the Division. Your nonreliable sources don't know basic information about the Divison against whom they are making their claims.21:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Maybe they werent able to get to Tarnopol, remember about 2 regiments (4-5) of Galizien which were used to pacifications. --Paweł5586 (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So now you are just making things up.Faustian (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sources didnt mention about what happened with Galizien unit after Chodaczków. But description of massacre is clear. In Motyka book i have found reference about Galizien massacres directing to Korman's book. It means for Motyka Korman's book is reliable source. I can scan this page and show you. Korman wrote about Chodaczków, Palikrowy, Podkamień and other Galizien's crimes--Paweł5586 (talk) 06:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because Motyka lifted some pieces of information from Korman does not mean that he endorses Korman's work as a whole. It is original research on your part to suggest that this is the case. Indeed, since you have failed to come up with a reference from Motyka regarding Chodaczkow it logical to assume that Motyka, having read Korman's work and not mentioned this massacre (which, if it had happened, would have ben one the biggest ones), decided it did not happen.  But who knows.  The bottom line is that if the only place you can find it is in Korman's book, Or Prus', or the work by non-historians then it doesn't belong in wikipedia.Faustian (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Maybe, Maybe. ... Maybe ? If it can't be backed up by evidence then it should not be here in Wikipedia. Put it into the Maybepedia. For me it seems that if the Polish Wikipedia does not have a separate article for this topic, then there must be a reason for this - i.e. either it didn't happen, or there are not enough document there to prove it happened. Why place such a poorly researched and written article on the English wikipedia? Maybe the intent is to stir up discontent and spread inaccurate perceptions. I still think it should be removed and removed quickly. I have had dozens of article s removed which did not have inaccuracies, but for various reasons were deemed insignificant. This entry is not only so insignificant that it does not warrant a separate article on the Polish wiki but contains flawed materials. Bandurist (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Maybe is about what was after crime. There is enough evidences about massacre. A list of persons who were killed.--Paweł5586 (talk) 10:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Produced by a nonreliable source.Faustian (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * But not enough real evidence to warrant an article in Polish wikipedia about what appears to be a traumatic Polish event. 12:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Soviet tank attack
БОЙОВІ ДІЇ У ЗАХІДНІЙ УКРАЇНІ ТА В КАРПАТАХ ... 14-15 квітня в оборонних боях поблизу с. Великий Ходачків Козівського району екіпаж танка під командуванням гвардії лейтенанта з Дніпропетровщини М.Г. Карпенка, відбиваючи атаку противника, знищив 7 танків, 3 бронетранспортери і багато гітлерівців. У травні М.Г. Карпенко удостоєний звання Героя Радянського Союзу, а через два місяці його не стало. Похований відважний танкіст у Тернополі.

http://www.peremoga.gov.ua/index.php?2141005000000000050

Date is the same but it Doesn't say Galizien nor UIA.

Мой дед - Карпенко Николай Григорьевич, командир танкового взвода сгорел в танке в ходе освобождения города Тернополь Западной Украины в 44-м. Герой Советского Союза посмертно. Так выглядит памятник, установленный в его и моего отца родном селе Червоном Яру, что на Днепропетровщине, где сейчас и живет мой отец. 9 Мая позвонил Боб, он сейчас служит в Тернополе и рассказал, что нашел в Тернополе место захоронения деда, сам я на Западной еще не бывал. Это находится на Холме Славы, где братская могила, но у Николая Григорьевича отдельная с плитой, как оказалось он взводом прорвался в авангарде наступления и почти 2 недели без воды и пищи оборонял занятый участок против подразделений дивизии Вермахта "мертвая голова". Лично сжег несколько Тигров и бронемашин. После гибели немцы сами похоронили его со всеми воинскими почестями. Солдаты...

http://svvptau.borda.ru/?1-4-0-00000031-000-0-0

Bandurist (talk) 01:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Interesting! So according to this source, no less reliable than the ones alleging a massacre, there was a big tank battle there on the date of the supposed massacre. Might that account for alleged civilian casualties?Faustian (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

yea right:) Palikrowy is close to Podkamień. In Podkamień UPA made massacres from 12 to 16. Motyka wrote about it. --Paweł5586 (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Er, we are talking about Velykyi Khodachkiv here, not Pidkamin or Palikrowy. I may be wrong, but it seems that you are stating that Pidkamin massacre was from the 12-16. Are you claiming that the elements of the Division were at two places at the same time - killing Poles at Pidkamin (12-16) and killing Poles at Velykyi Khodachkiv (the 15th)? Faustian (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Of course I was wrong. Thank for notice that.--Paweł5586 (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

"Woman said"
You dont belive in Polish historians or researchers books but you belive what one Polish woman said. This source isnt reliable - www page, an interview - by who? In this interview the woman said that she came back to Chodaczków in 1945, so after the massacre. She was expelled to Sibir: ''[...]Dnia 10 lutego 1940 r. nie da się wymazać z pamięci.[...]Trudno opisać, z jakim bólem i rozpaczą trzeba było się żegnać z rodzinnym domem, otoczeniem, krewnymi, znajomymi, koleżankami ze szkoły. [...]'' Thats why she didnt mention about massacre. And thing that she doesnt mention about the massacre isnt any evidence.

Now we got one more source - Grzegorz Hryciuk. The truth is obvious. --Paweł5586 (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It's clearly marked that this is what one woman claimed, not that it is the Truth. The website the interview is taken from is not a some sort of nationalist one: and what the woman says doesn't seem to be particularly controversial. If other people have a problem with it I don't object to its removal but it shouldn't be removed because it contradicts what one person is trying to present. User:Faustian|Faustian]] (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


 * This woman wasnt at Chodaczków in 1944. She had left the village in 1940 and came back in 1945 y. So she isnt a witness.--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I think she would have known if one of the largest massacres of Polish civilians ever had occured a few months prior to her return, what do you think? Anyways, I would like to know other editors opinions before removing this.  As I mentioned, the source for the interview is a nuetral one, not some kind of Polish or Ukrainian nationalist source, and more info about this village can probably be used from this source. It is presented in the article as one resident's opinion, not as the truth. What do others think? I'll abide by whatever the consensus turns out to be. Faustian (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with Faustian.Galassi (talk) 15:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

"I think" - there is no place for Orginal research in Wikipedia. She didnt mention becouse maybe they are afraid or any other reason. She is not a reliable or academic source. Poles were expelled to Poland from Chodaczków at the begining 1945, there werent in that time in Chodaczków any witness to told her what happened.--Paweł5586 (talk) 16:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your speculations - "She didnt mention becouse maybe they are afraid or any other reason." - are as much original research as mine. I agree that she is not a reliable or academic source, but rather a primary source, which is why we follow WP:PRIMARY with respect to using her observations taken from the interview. "Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. Without a secondary source, a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge." We DO NOT use the interview to draw conclusions - that would be wrong because the interview is merely a primary source. We only describe what she stated (or claimed). Again, if her claims appeared in an unreliable source such as a nationalist website then they definitely wouldn't belong here. but they appear to be taken from a nuetral website, so they don't seem problematic.Faustian (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I feel this information is pertinent and important to include in the article. Here we have an oral account, similar in many ways to much of the material in the collections of the Wroclaw group only quite neutral and not towing the tenets that ths group is pushing. I beleive it should stay. --Bandurist (talk) 14:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

We got primary source: polish historian Grzegorz Hryciuk, Przemiany narodowościowe i ludnościowe w Galicji Wschodniej i na Wołyniu w latach 1931-1948, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, 2005. --Paweł5586 (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Hryciuk didnt use any word which can be translated as "allege". So stop pushing pov, we got serious source here.--Paweł5586 (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Aleksander Korman - Reliable Source?
Aleksander Korman - Reliable Source? Check out http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksander_Korman or Google translate at http://translate.google.ca/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=y&u=http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksander_Korman&sl=pl&tl=en&history_state0=

Bobanni (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Rafal Wnuk unequivocally considers Korman unreliable.Faustian (talk) 23:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

4th SS Police Regiment
There is a contradiction: Wikipedia says there was no 4th SS Police Regiment at that time. Lembit Staan (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Figured it out; see 14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_(1st_Galician). Lembit Staan (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)