Talk:Vemma/Archives/2015

Name of defendants
I've added the names of the defendants in the FTC suit in this edit. Tom Alkazin has been repeatedly cited as an exemplary distributor, so this seems like a significant detail. Although sources mention Tom Alkazin's wife Bethany Alkazin as a defendant, the suit itself lists her separately as a Relief Defendant, so I don't think her name specifically needs to be included. Grayfell (talk) 22:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Seems appropriate to me. Thanks for making the edit. Could also maybe use a bit of additional detail on the specific charges and actions outlined in the lawsuit. Rhode Island Red (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Definitely. I've expanded it a little, and it looks like there are plenty more sources about this now. Grayfell (talk) 08:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Tense
I have a feeling this is going to be an ongoing thing for a while, but I think switching to the past-tense is premature. Federal courts move slowly, and this will almost certainly take years to fully resolve. While it doesn't look good for Vemma, it's not a forgone conclusion that they will be shutdown completely, and there are several other possible outcomes. Right now the article is a mish-mash of past and present tenses, which obviously isn't going to work, so I'm switching back to present tense pending further discussion. Grayfell (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree completely. Rhode Island Red (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)