Talk:Venetian Snares x Daniel Lanois

Possible source
I can't access this site in the UK. I thought I'd put it here in case anyone else can use it. https://http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/la-ca-ms-california-sounds-daniel-lanois-jennifer-warnes-gene-clark-20180525-story.html Alduin2000 (talk) 19:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * , try this or this. Also I recommend avoiding "dateline" prose structure whenever possible ("In March 201X, Y. In April 201X, Z.") czar  19:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll keep that in mind, thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 19:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * , fwiw, I also recommend Wikipedia:Copyediting reception sections on writing holistic Reception sections czar  20:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I was roughly organising it by how positive the reviews are but I'll take into account other factors too, thanks for the tip. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

just out of interest, would you recommend splitting a single review up into multiple different paragraphs so each paragraphs retains a single (or almost single) point or should each review be summarised completely together? Alduin2000 (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It depends on the review contents. Ideally you could group review contents by subject (e.g., ¶ on influence/sounds like/cultural allusion, ¶ on technical detail and production quality, etc.) I'd only group by reviewer as a last resort, mainly because it's boring to read a list of reviewers sequentially and more interesting to read a holistic account of general reviewer consensus on the record. czar  20:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)