Talk:Venezuelan Air Force

Aircraft numbers
Can someone source the recent changes to the aircraft numbers/types? They sound reasonable (i.e. I'm pretty sure the CN-295 deal was scuppered?) but being sure (i.e. T-34 no longer in service?) would be good. - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 15:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I am answering late. i saw your guestion now. the numbers is as you read them at the inventory. their is no C-295 deal. cancelled. the T-34 dont exist. retired. the F-16, President Chavez said that are 10 in service. the rest exist but no operational. the number of Sukhoi fighter is very possible to increase in future. new tranport and trainer planes will be order. at the present inventory is very possible that some airplanes and helicopters will be donate to other South American coutries, especcialy to Bolivia. John, Athens Greece, May 29.

I changed the f-16 number back to 10. Someone put 21 has operational, and the official reports talk only about 10. All in all, I belive thats the real number of funcional Vipers. Francisco, Aveiro Portugal, 5 April 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.140.6 (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Missing type?
Venezuela was supposed to get a fleet of two-seater AMX ground attack warplanes from Italy. What happened to those? 82.131.210.162 (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Falklands/Malvinas War
Where is the brief history of the Venuezuelan Air Force during the Falklands War? If, indeed, Wikipedia is not WP:CENSORed, and a neutral point of view, then it seems the loss of nearly 100 aircraft in a conflict of a couple of months duration would warrant a sentence, or a paragraph, in the History section of the Venezuelan Air Force article. Thoughts? N2e (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Venezuelan Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080914223542/http://english.eluniversal.com:80/2008/02/21/en_pol_art_russia-to-promote-su_21A1376761.shtml to http://english.eluniversal.com/2008/02/21/en_pol_art_russia-to-promote-su_21A1376761.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Venezuelan Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090628125548/http://www.itar-tass.com:80/eng/level2.html?NewsID=13081489&PageNum=0 to http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=13081489&PageNum=0
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120306075035/http://www.aviacion.mil.ve/modules/news/article.php?storyid=49 to http://www.aviacion.mil.ve/modules/news/article.php?storyid=49

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Mi-35M / 28?
I thought Venezuela air force operates these other than Mi-17?

38.88.97.200 (talk) 02:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 5 May 2019

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. Consensus is clearly against the proposal. bd2412 T 04:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Venezuelan Air Force → Venezuelan air force – Per MOS:MILTERMS. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose this is a proper noun. Please stop RMing these air forces which are clearly proper nouns. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose concur with Peacemaker67 - FOX 52 (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose concur with Peacemaker67 as well. Tyguy9112 (talk) 12:56, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Translation?
Uh I honestly think that there should be English translations and equivalent ranks to the US Armed Forces. Can someone fix this? I don't speak Spanish. Faith15 19:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)