Talk:Venice Charter

Untitled
Anything known about Germany's role in this Charter ? --House1630 (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

No source for outdated claim or opposition to reconstruction
"However, the document is now seen as outdated, representing Modernist views opposed to reconstruction."

As far as I know, the Venice Charter is still being discussed and applied around the world, so it is not outdated, it is just claimed as outdated by its detractors.

It is also not opposed to reconstruction in itself, it is opposed to hypothetical reconstruction, if anything.

I think in general this article would benefit from more substantiation. ICOMOS provides a lot of sources on conservation and explains the current interpretation quite well here:

"Discussion on the subject of reconstruction has been difficult, because reconstruction has often been considered as a taboo for heritage conservation. The Operational Guidelines of the World Heritage Convention also states that reconstruction would be justifiable only under “exceptional circumstances” (para.86 of the OG [2017]). Hence debates on reconstruction have taken place within a particular conception of authenticity. The main focus of the debates has been what aspects of heritage should be taken into consideration to assess the aspects and conditions of authenticity. Focus has traditionally been placed on the material aspects of heritage, while other aspects could be considered only if the information on such aspects was proven to have sufficient credibility. This broader approach has been accepted to analyze the authenticity on doctrinal and practical levels. However, when the social dimensions of heritage have been changed through immigration, conflict, and other social phenomena, more elaborate analysis seems necessary." source Llehsadam (talk) 20:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

uncorrect links
This page contains many links to pages that are not available to the public! Heiner Krellig (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)