Talk:Vergil (Devil May Cry)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Picking this up for a review now that I have some more time, and I would be interested in reading more about this character. Aoba47 (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Lead and infobox
 * I would be a little more specific in the ALT text for the infobox image, as you could technically apply to any image of any character from the video game series.
 * Done.
 * I have a suggestion for this sentence (Vergil was originally conceptualized as Nelo Angelo—Dante's rival in terms of moves and appearance—in the 2001 game.). I think “portrayed” is a better word choice than “conceptualized”.
 * Done.
 * Creation and concept
 * I would be more descriptive in the ALT text, as it could apply to any image of a video game character.
 * Done.
 * I would combine these two sentences (Nelo Angelo was created as a rival for Dante; he was designed by Makoto Tsuchibayashi) to the following (Makoto Tsuchibayashi designed Nelo Angelo as a rival for Dante).
 * Done.
 * For these two sentences (Ikeno stated that because Vergil and Dante are identical twins, they share a hairstyle in the opening of the game, which was intended to make new players confuse them. Vergil's clothing was intended to contrast with his brother's; similarly, Nelo Angelo's design was prominently blue while Dante's was red.), I would avoid using “intended” twice in close proximity.
 * Done
 * For this sentence (Unlike other enemy demons from Devil May Cry, Nelo Angelo did not have original frameworks;), do you know if there is a way to wikilink “frameworks” to help an unfamilar reader?
 * Tried adding an easier concept.
 * Voice actors
 * I would avoid having a two sentence paragraph if possible.
 * Done.
 * Characteristics
 * Everything looks good here.


 * Appearances
 * Unlink the games that were wikilinked in the previous section. I have noticed several instances of this.
 * Done.
 * Reception
 * Unlink Project X Zone 2.
 * Done.
 * Final comments
 * Wonderful work with the article. I could not find that many issues with it (at least for the level of a GA). Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. I tried fixing all the issues you pointed. Also, I gotta thank Flowerpiep for helping me with a minor copyedit.Tintor2 (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for addressing everything. I will ✅ this. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate either an image or source review for my current FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 00:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)