Talk:Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014)

Needs further updating for Common Carrier status
I'm not an expert, so I'm not going to make the changes, but I think it's pretty clear that the significance and meaning of this case has changed since this article was written. In 2015, the year after this decision, the FCC cited this case and the continuing need for Net Neutrality as the reason to class ISPs as "common carriers". This gave the FCC extremely broad jurisdiction and was widely seen as a huge win for Net Neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.58.8 (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2014 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

"Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._Federal_Communications_Commission(2014)&redirect=no Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)