Talk:Verma module

sum of weights
"δ is the sum of all fundamental weights" I think it should be half of the sum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoxide (talk • contribs) 09:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

induced rep
perhaps it should be mentioned that this is an induced representation.

Also this is slightly off from the definition I have seen everywhere else, where the numbering is offset by delta to get nicer symmetry properties. The way it's presented here makes the initial definition easier to understand but makes the containment properties harder to state. Perhaps the existence of another type of number should be mentioned somewhere.

wakimoto
There was a request for a Wakimoto module article. Should this article be made to include contragredient Verma in order to accommodate that? AHusain (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Sure 67.198.37.16 (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Multiplication by $$h(\lambda)$$
Souldn't the multiplication by $$\lambda$$ in the definition of the $$F_\lambda$$ module be replaced by multiplication by $$h(\lambda)$$ for $$h \in \mathfrak{h}$$ ?