Talk:Vermont's at-large congressional district

At-large vs. District 1
I'd like to create a new article for Vermont's 1st congressional district. It would be an obsolete district occurring when Vermont had multiple districts. Since there were multiple representatives, technically it shouldn't be under this header since those reps were not elected statewide at-large. Thoughts?????.....Pmeleski 11:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The district is considered "At-large" because Vermont only has one congressional district. This is the same format used for the other states which have only one member representing them in the U.S. House of Representatives, for other examples of this format, please see Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Vermont's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061004/NEWS02/610040305/1007
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070725184700/http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html to http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)