Talk:Vermont Route 14/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Good work, just some techicalities and we're done!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): - Updated:   —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC) b (MoS):  - Updated:   —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Metric conversions are needed in both route description sections.
 * Second Branch White River? - This make sense, but perhaps adding "of the" makes it more of an accurate read. (Based on my assumption)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Excellent sources. If it is possible, maybe secondary sources for the description, but the map will carry.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Updated:   —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Putting on hold pending prose review and conversion corrections
 * Thanks for the quick turn-around on the review. Regarding the wording of the river, "Second Branch White River" is how it is listed on topographic maps. However, when I checked how various published texts treat this, I found more instances where it is written as "Second Branch of the White River". I have made the change as you suggested since it does read better this way. I have also added kilometer conversions for mile figures in the prose. I have also added USGS topographic maps as a reference for the route description as some of the geographic features described are not obvious on Google Maps. Let me know if you find anything else after you re-review. Thanks again. --Polaron | Talk 04:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * All "good" now - congrats. —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Updated:   —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Putting on hold pending prose review and conversion corrections
 * Thanks for the quick turn-around on the review. Regarding the wording of the river, "Second Branch White River" is how it is listed on topographic maps. However, when I checked how various published texts treat this, I found more instances where it is written as "Second Branch of the White River". I have made the change as you suggested since it does read better this way. I have also added kilometer conversions for mile figures in the prose. I have also added USGS topographic maps as a reference for the route description as some of the geographic features described are not obvious on Google Maps. Let me know if you find anything else after you re-review. Thanks again. --Polaron | Talk 04:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * All "good" now - congrats. —  master son T - C 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)