Talk:Vermont Route 17

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): - Updated:   —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)) b (MoS):  - Updated:   —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Updated:   —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Updated:   —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: - Updated:   —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

—  master son T - C 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Updated - passed congratulations  —  master son T - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)